Analysis Of Desiree s Baby By Kate Chopin - 1446 Words

Analysis of Desiree’s Baby In the story Desiree s Baby by Kate Chopin the plot mainly revolves around race issues and also includes elements of sexism. In terms of race the difference between being white and being black shows vital importance in the characters lives through the story. As Desiree and Armand both originally associate themselves with the white class, once the plot unveils their black heritage they are faced with uncertainty, and ultimately their lives become meaningless and not worth living. This meaninglessness is shown through the symbolism Chopin uses of white objects being portrayed positively and black objects being discussed negatively. Gender roles are explored throughout the story as Desiree faces the struggles of establishing herself to the fullest potential. The plot of Chopin s Desiree s Baby centers around the complex themes of race and gender. Racism is a prevalent topic throughout Desiree s Baby, as the color of a person s skin is the main fac tor that determines the value of his life. In the story when Desiree comes to the conclusion that she is black and the baby s blackness comes from her she exclaims, You must know it is not true. I shall die. I must die. I cannot be so unhappy and live (Chopin 244). As Desiree must face the fact that everyone is telling her she is black, she begins to attempt to deny what is becoming obvious. The meaning that her life had as a white woman instantly is destroyedShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of Desiree s Baby By Kate Chopin919 Words   |  4 PagesDesiree’s Baby†: An Annotated bibliography Thesis: Kate Chopin combines the racial and social differences on the eighteen century, in which people have to face racial discrimination amongst a social empire, which brings many conflicts within diverse couples about their firstborns. Chopin, Kate Desiree’s Baby. Short Stories (print 7/14/2015). In the short story, Desiree’s Baby, written by Kate Chopin there is a about of karma and consequences that produce the drama on the literature. The storyRead MoreAn Analysis Of Kate Chopin s Desiree s Baby Essay1067 Words   |  5 Pages Kate Chopin life and her short story Dà ©sirà ©e’s Baby Chopin was an American novelist and she also wrote many short stories. Chopin was a feminist pioneer movement on American literature and the world. Chopin was born in St. Louis Missouri on February 8, 1850. Her father was an Irish immigrant who was a very successful businessman. Chopin father died when she was a little girl. For that reason, she grew up with her mother and grandmother since she was a child. She was an insatiable reader and thatRead MoreAnalysis Of Kate Chopin s Desiree s Baby 987 Words   |  4 Pagesunderstanding of people are compromised.† Kate Chopin’s story, â€Å"Desiree’s Baby† is a story solely of racial identity, sexism, pride and love. Throughout, there’s symbolism to indicate unequal gender functions, as well as racial prejudice. Readers become mindful of the effects love and pride has over actions, as the story foreshadows numerously. Thoroughly, analytical evidence will focus on the irony of racial identity, symbolism of sexism, pride and love. Desiree’s Baby is a short story centered directlyRead MoreAn Analysis Of Kate Chopin s Desiree s Baby 1705 Words   |  7 Pagesand published in 1893, Kate Chopin’s work â€Å"Desiree’s Baby† is a short story about miscegenation within a French family living in Louisiana in the late nineteenth century. Miscegenation is defined as the mixture of different racial groups, through marriage or cohabitation, between a white race and a member of another race. Chopin writes this piece of realistic fiction which exposes the issues of society that would not be faced until many years after her death. â€Å"Desiree’s Baby† revolves around two mainRead MoreAnalysis Of Kate Chopin s Desiree s Baby 951 Words   |  4 Pagesa major problem in the late nineteenth century. In Kate Chopin’s â€Å"Desiree’s Baby†, there were characters with extreme views towards race which led to a gruesome death. The major conflicts in â€Å"Desireeà ¢â‚¬â„¢s Baby† are from Armand assuming what he thought about Desiree was right, and not taking another answer that could be a possibility. Armand was the antagonist of the story and struggles against the beliefs that the country has about race. Desiree, the protagonist was in conflict with Armand over whoRead MoreAnalysis Of Kate Chopin s `` Desiree s Baby ``822 Words   |  4 PagesRegionalism reflected in Kate Chopin’s Writings During the latter half of the nineteenth-century, American literature had a renaissance with the development of new writing styles that strived to fully grasp and express the American way of life. Regionalism, which is a writing style that incorporates setting, dialect, and local color of certain regions of the United States was prominent among these new writing styles. Kate Chopin, one of the most prominent feminist writers of the nineteenth-centuryRead MoreAn Analysis Of Armand Aubigny s Desiree s Baby 1538 Words   |  7 PagesArmand Aubigny’s Pride in â€Å"Desiree’s Baby† by Kate Chopin Through history, we have always yearned independence and equality as human beings. Undoubtedly, Kate Chopin is an extraordinary example She has landed a commendable place among American writers worthy of recognition. Born in St. Louis, Missouri in 1850, Kate was raised by strong women who taught her the value of an education. Her family gave her a revolutionary vision and a feminist personality, but it was her talented and passionate skillsRead MoreAn Examination Of How Kate Chopin s Work1298 Words   |  6 PagesENGL 1102 – Comp/Lit Essay 2 (Mulry) Sellers, James R – 920022413 Due Date: April 20, 2015 An Examination of How Kate Chopin’s Works Taken Together Contribute to our Understanding of Her Time and the Place of Women in Society Looking at themes present in his short stories and novels, Kate Chopin presents examples of female strength and an assertive rebellion to the social norms during the late 1800s. By seeking to transparently and boldly portray the risquà © behavior of her lead characters, whichRead MoreInferences Lead to Tragedy: Irony that Ruins in Kate Chopins Desirees Baby744 Words   |  3 Pages Kate Chopin utilizes irony in â€Å"Desiree’s Baby† to warn people of the dangers of racism and how it can victimize not only the hated race, but also the one who is racist. â€Å"Desiree’s Baby† is a tale about a young slave owner, Armand, with a well-respected name in Louisiana. He marries an adopted woman named Desiree and once they have their child, he notices that the baby has black features. He assumes that since he does not know his wife’s racial background that his wife must have some sort ofRead MoreDesiree s Baby : A Literary Analysis1582 Words   |  7 PagesDesiree’s Baby—A Literary Analysis In the short story, â€Å"Desiree’s Baby,† Kate Chopin exposes the harsh realities of racial divide, male dominance, and slavery in Antebellum Louisiana. Although written in 1894, Chopin revisits the deep-south during a period of white privilege and slavery. Told through third-person narration, the reader is introduced to characters whose individual morals and values become the key elements leading to the ironic downfall of this antebellum romance. As Chopin takes the

Incarceration And High Disproportionality Of Aboriginal...

By incarcerating offenders the state based justice system ignores offenders needs and histories (Elliott, 2011, p. 72). The state assumes offenders are rational. This rationality is tied to the system looking at the individual level or the â€Å"bad apples† of responsibility (Zimbardo, 2008; Elliot, 2011, p. 72). However, a rational decision maker is unable to always predict potential alternatives and consequences (Zsolnai, 1997). Therefore, the individual level of responsibly ignores other systematic factors that influence offending. It is arguable that the Western system examines beyond the individual level by incorporating specific sentencing principles for Aboriginal people (see R v Gladue, 1999). However, society still has mass†¦show more content†¦This is likely to curb the successful development of informal controls which is seen as a better deterrent than formal systems of control, like incarceration (MacKenzie De Li, 2002, p. 244). Community justice benefits over the state based justice system with respect to punishment. Specifically, community justice focuses on the restoration and rehabilitation (Taylor Auerhahn, 2015, p. 303), rather than incarceration. Transgressions are given to the victims, offenders and community to resolve rather than letting the state impose arbitrary sanctions. Community justice allows for more direct solutions to solve crime through the collective agreement between all stakeholders (Wenzel et al., 2008, p. 376). This allows for restorative treatment which has higher levels of satisfaction than traditional forms of incarceration (Wenzel et al., 2008, p. 377). The second limitation of the state based justice is system is that victims are ignored and excluded from the formal criminal justice process (Daigle, 2012, p. 2). Under the state system the power is taken away from victims and placed into the hands of the state to ensure control over the criminal proceedings (Elliott, 2011, p. 65). Gromet and Darley (20 06) argue that crime victims experience marginalization and frustration due to their exclusion in criminal proceedings (p. 396). They lack voice and an ability to

Why the Korean War Broke Out Free Essays

Why did the Korean War break out? Reasons as to why war broke out in Korea can be debated due to the fact that a number of factors contributed towards the war. The viewpoint of North Korea starting the war can be seen as Kim ill sung had the intention of reuniting Korea under communism, however there was hostility within South Korea as Syngman Rhee also aimed to reunite Korea under his nationalist views. The two superpowers of the time can be seen as responsible for the outbreak of war because the Korean War can be viewed as a product of the cold war as the USSR backed the north and the USA helped fight with the south. We will write a custom essay sample on Why the Korean War Broke Out or any similar topic only for you Order Now The view of war breaking out as a result internal conflict within Korea can be seen due to both Kim’s and Rhee’s intent on reuniting Korea under their leadership. North Korea’s aggression towards starting the war is due to the fact that Kim aimed on bringing communism to the south and unite the whole of Korea; Kim’s intent on starting war can be seen in the fact that he had multiple visits to Stalin in order to receive both permission and support for invading the south. Kim was able to persuade Stalin to let him invade by stating there would be no US intervention and that he would have control over the South within a few weeks. North Korea’s actions can also be seen as to why war broke out because they did pass the 38th parallel and invade the south, therefore acting as the aggressor as they had had military equipment supplied by the USSR with an army 135,000 men who believed in what they were fighting for as supposed to South Korea’s unprepared smaller army made up of conscripted men. Regardless of the fact that the north was first to invade the south, blame can still be put on Rhee for the outbreak of war. This is due to the fact that South Korea did launch small scale attacks on the north prior to the invasion and this can be seen as a form of instigation for war. The outbreak of war can also be seen as the result of internal Korean conflict as Rhee had the same intentions as Kim to reunite Korea by invading past the 38th parallel, only Kim was able to do it first as he had soviet support making him the dominate power whereas Rhee had no US support at the start of the North’s invasion. The war between North and south Korea was regarded as a civil war by the British yet when we look closer into why the war broke out we can see that the superpowers were behind it and that the Korean civil war can be seen as a product of the cold war occurring between the USA and USSR at the time. The USSR can be seen to have responsibility for the outbreak of war as it can be argued that Kim would have not invaded the south without Stalin’s support and permission because without Stalin’s military support Kim would not have been powerful enough to achieve his goal of gaining total control of Korea within a few weeks after his invasion. The USSR can also accept responsibility for the war because of fact that Stalin aimed to spread his communist sphere of influence across the world. Stalin had initially rejected Kim’s request of invading the south but in 1950 he granted Kim support and permission to invade, this was most likely due to the fact that communism was established in china at the time giving him incentive to spread his communist support throughout Asia and also he had successfully detonated the atom bomb giving him more reason to believe that the US would not repeat their use of the atom bomb on Stalin out of fear of retaliation. China’s contribution towards the outbreak war is slim as their only initial contribution to the start of the war was to allow for soviet supplies to pass through china and reach the North Koreans. The involvement of the USA can be seen as the reason why the conflict within Korea transformed from a civil war into a fully recognised war. US aims during the cold war was to contain the spread of communism so that the â€Å"domino theory† would not occur therefore when they were alerted that the North Koreans invaded the south they went to the United Nations in order to get involved in the war. Other reasons for US involvement include the fact that elections were coming up and Truman believed that taking action in Korea would boost his support. Although the US originally intended to help prevent the north spreading communism to the south McArthur found that he was having great success in fighting the north Korans within South Korea gave him reason to pass the 38th parallel and attempt to take completely remove communism from Korea. The US doing this created outbreak of war in Korea as china decided to get involved out of fear of the US approaching the Yalu River, therefore Turing a civil war into the Korean War Overall the outbreak of war can be blamed all factors that contributed the war. The war breakout can be seen as the result of aggression with Korea with both Kim and Rhee launching small scale attack on each other and sharing the intent of uniting Korea however the superpowers are responsible for the actual outbreak of the Koran war. This is because both sides of Korea would not have been strong enough to start a war without the influence of the superpowers. The USSR gave permission and supplies to Kim allowing him to invade the south and America got involved in Korea creating a war as it caused a form of retaliation from the south that would have lost against a soviet fueled invasion from the north. Therefore the Korean War was a product of the cold war between America and the USSR. How to cite Why the Korean War Broke Out, Essay examples

Governance and Management Health †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Governance and Management Health. Answer: Introduction Governance and Managementboth are terms that are widely used in business organizations. Most of the people co relates them which is wrong. They are similar in fewer fields but Governance andManagement both hold their own importances in their own manner. Governance is defined as Forming of policies and nonstop observations of their accurate execution by the employees of the central body of an organization, it includes the system of harmonizing the powers of the members and their primary duty of increasing the success and validity of the organization (King, 2013). Whereas Management is defined by many renowned authors and one of the definition given by them is provided here as: Management is an art of knowing what is to be done , when it is to be done , how it is to be done and by whom it is to be done (Taylor, 2011). F.W Taylor was considered as the father of the scientific management. Here we will study the concepts of governance and management in detail. Governance is any rule, policy or standard that is set by the upper level or the higher authorities of an organization to reach to the organization goals. Whereas Management is concerned with every little activity of the organization, what an employee is doing, how to take correct measures if anything has gone out of control. Governance is doing right things whereas Management is doing things right(GRP, 2014). Governance and management both are similar as they both work in achieving the goals of the organization. Governance is related to the structure of an organization where as management is related to the day to day operations of the organization(Rana, 2011). Governance and Management works together in order to ensure proper governance, a well maintained management is required that can ensure proper working of the staff. For each and every big to small organizational activity the higher authorities have made ru les and regulations that defines the degree between the governance and management in that particular activity (Gupta, 2007). Both the terms management and governance holds importance in their own manner, however we could say governance holds a bit more importance as it is the area that directs the management towards the achieving of the goals. It is true that governance comes first and later comes the management but we cant ignore the fact that if there is an absence of an effective management then competent governance is of waste only. Competent Governance is a requirement of every organization where as an effective management is a need of every organization. Effective governance will make such rules, standards, and objectives, policies that now or later will prove beneficial for the organization. With the help of effective management those rules, standards, objectives, policies will be maintained and achieved. Hence both the Governance and the Management holds importance in their own respective dimensions. Governance Clinical governance is a systematic approach in which the firm is responsible for constant improving the worth of their services and safeguarding high standards(Nayyer, 2011) Under the collaborative governance performs jointly with the management and creates such a proactive environment that management works without any interference from the high end authority and they take an active part in all the high end matters. Management Project Management is a defined system of implementing, preparing, handling and initiating the job of the group to attain specific goals (Taylor, 2011) Under risk management the managers evaluates, predicts, forecasts future uncertainties in order to be ready for them , so that business could survive it easily The principles of management were given by the (Fayol, 2012) whereas principles of governance were given by (King, 2013) Management Henry Fayol emphasized on unity of the workers as the first principle of the management, if there is no unity amongst the workers then no management can achieve its objectives. Unity of direction is another principle of management; the entire company must be working in order to achieve a common objective. Henry Fayol mentioned that authority and responsibility are related to each other, one cant work in the absence of the other. So both authority responsibility must be given together to an employee. Governance An effective leadership is the first and foremost principle of the governance, the company must be leaded by a competent leader who can take risky as well as right decisions for the firm. The high end governing body should be accountable to the whole organization for their decisions. The high end governing body must set rules and regulations and examples of no malpractices , and should not be involved in any kind of frauds GOVERNANCE Governance is the related with the decision making or setting up rules or policies or framing standards for the organization that each every employee needs to follow. MANAGEMENT On the other hand management is related to all the administrative work of the organization, managers make sure that all the rules and regulation made by the governing body are being followed properly. Governance consists of a governing body, or people interested in the affairs of the organization (shareholders). They are a high end power that comes prior to everything. Whereas management consists of middle or subordinate level of employees that comes on second after governance. They need to follow all the orders of governance. As said above governance makes policies, rules and regulations for the organization as whole. These policies, rules are made to take the organization to its objectives. On the other hand management is only concerned with implementing those rules and polices and to make sure that these sets of rules and policies are doing well in order to achieve objectives Governance can be said as more important than management , as it is done by the governing body and all the core decisions are finalized by them Management may not be as important as governance but in absence of an effective management , government alone cannot do anything Governance is only concerned with achieving of objectives , the high end authority may set up the objectives only But it is the management that allocates appropriate sources to required areas in order to achieve those objectives. Conclusion By gathering and observing all the given facts and statements a brief conclusion is written over here , Governance and Management are somehow co-related to each other and they cannot perform well in the absence of one another. Governance do hold an up hand but that doesnt means management is of low importance. Hence both governance and management are important for a sound organization. Bibliography Blog, M. (2010). Functional Management. New York: MPublishers. Fayol, H. (2012). Principles of management. New Delhi: Jissa Publishers. GRP. (2014). GRP SOURCE BOOK. In Gandyol (Ed.). New Delhi: World Hust. Gupta, P. (2007). Institute of indian chartered accountants. ICAI. King, W. (2013). Business Organisation. Journal on Business Management , 10-23. Nayyer, C. (2011). Governance of ' World (5th ed., Vol. 1). (H. Chanda, micheal, Eds.) New York, USA: ADV MDG Publishers. Rana. (2011). Management of Organisation. Choudhary Publishers. Taylor, F. (2011). Management. (f. taylor, Ed.)Scientific Management , vol.2, 21-49.